v4vhse
Welcome to your own forum
v4vhse

A forum for all VHSE staff in Kerala service and for students.Also this site is dedicated to all educational aspirants

For publishing announcements or any other matters send the same to v4vhse@gmail.com

Log in

I forgot my password



Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Poll

Do you favor/oppose General Transfer

56% 56% [ 199 ]
2% 2% [ 6 ]
33% 33% [ 119 ]
3% 3% [ 9 ]
7% 7% [ 24 ]

Total Votes : 357

Top posters
Malamaram chakkappan (567)
 
raman (428)
 
pareekutty (267)
 
safeerm (97)
 
vivaradoshi (78)
 
satheesh (78)
 
icsure (74)
 
dilna (68)
 
ganeshh (65)
 
Nissangan (61)
 

Like/Tweet/+1
Statistics
We have 1336 registered users
The newest registered user is tarlyjames

Our users have posted a total of 2314 messages in 1231 subjects
Affiliates
free forum

Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search

You are not connected. Please login or register

v4vhse » Career Corner » Current Affairs » UGC NET Why aggregate is wrong?

UGC NET Why aggregate is wrong?

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1default UGC NET Why aggregate is wrong? on Tue Jan 29, 2013 8:37 pm

Malamaram chakkappan


Hall of fame
Hall of fame
What is wrong with aggregate 65% criteria
RA means right
answers, PI P2 and P3 are Paper 1.2 and 3
See notes and analysis in sheet 2 of this work sheet
PI right answers PI Marks PI % P2 Ri.Ans P2 Marks P2 % PI+P2 RA PI+P2 Marks PI+P2% P3 RA P3 Marks P3% Total RA Total Marks Aggregate %
50 100 100 50 100 100 100 200 100 75 150 100 175 350 100
20 40 40 20 40 40 40 80 40 38 76 50.67 78 156 44.57
20 40 40 20 40 40 40 80 40 74 148 98.67 114 228 65.14
20 40 20 20 40 40 40 80 40 75 150 100 115 230 65.71
32 64 64 33 66 66 65 130 65 49 98 65.33 114 228 65.14
20 40 40 20 40 40 40 80 40 73 146 97.33 113 226 64.57
20 40 40 37 74 74 57 114 57 56 112 74.67 113 226 64.57
20 40 40 20 40 40 40 80 40 73 146 97.33 113 226 64.57
50 100 100 26 52 52 76 152 76 38 76 50.67 114 228 65.14
Highlights and Findings
1) 44.57% is the effective minimum aggregate % referred in original notification for general candidates and there is more than 20% increase in the criteria published after result. Such a high increase is not justifiable on any ground (refer row number 5,6,7 and 8 of sheet1
2) For the earlier descriptive version UGC considered Paper1 and 2 are qualifying to evaluate the 3rd paaper. When this concept is followed here a candidate scored minimum in those two papers have to score almost 100% in 3rd paper to get the 65% aggregate ( Refer row 43,44 and 45 )
3) When taking an average it requires 32 correct answers out of 50 for paper1 and 33 out of 50 in paper 2 and 49 out of 75 in paper 3 to acquire 65% (refer row Cool
4) A candidate who scored 74% both in subject papers ie.Paper 2 and 3 will be failed (refer row 602)
5) A candidate who may score 97.33% in third paper can be in failed list while mere 50% in 3rd could be passed (refer row 1096 and 1188 ) and still more nonsense you can when this is analysed more

download

u


-----------------------------

----------------------------

----------------------------

v4vhse.forumotion.in

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum