v4vhse
Welcome to your own forum
v4vhse

A forum for all VHSE staff in Kerala service and for students.Also this site is dedicated to all educational aspirants

For publishing announcements or any other matters send the same to v4vhse@gmail.com

Log in

I forgot my password



Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Poll

Do you favor/oppose General Transfer

56% 56% [ 199 ]
2% 2% [ 6 ]
33% 33% [ 119 ]
3% 3% [ 9 ]
7% 7% [ 24 ]

Total Votes : 357

Top posters
Malamaram chakkappan (567)
 
raman (428)
 
pareekutty (267)
 
safeerm (97)
 
vivaradoshi (78)
 
satheesh (78)
 
icsure (74)
 
dilna (68)
 
ganeshh (65)
 
Nissangan (61)
 

Like/Tweet/+1
Statistics
We have 1336 registered users
The newest registered user is tarlyjames

Our users have posted a total of 2314 messages in 1231 subjects
Affiliates
free forum

Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search

You are not connected. Please login or register

v4vhse » Career Corner » Current Affairs » Is UGC Criteria for December Rational?

Is UGC Criteria for December Rational?

Is UGC Policy of Declaring only Top 15% as winners for December 2012 rational?

26% 26% [ 227 ]
74% 74% [ 661 ]
Total Votes : 888

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1default Is UGC Criteria for December Rational? on Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:50 pm

raman


Legend of VHSE



All of you know the controversial June 2012 Examination conducted by UGCfor Lectureship and JRF. UGC introduced the complete objective type
exam for the first time in June 2012. Earlier the third paper was descriptive paper.

UGC with the notification for inviting application announced the criteria for June as follows

Catogery
PaperI
PaperII
PaperIII
Gen
40
40
50
OBC NCL
35
35
45
SC/ST/PH
35
35
40




In the notification there was a general statement containing "However the final............."

The carbon copy of OMR Sheet was given to candidates and all were waiting for publishing of Answer keys. When the provisional answer keys were published in UGC website, the happiness knew no bounds..........The messages passed from cell to cell with a proud sentence " I am also
have cleared NET.

On September 18 the wind blew in reverse pace.......... Many of candidates looked through the Result PDF published by UGC. They moved their eyes from roll no. to roll no and painfully realised that their roll number is missing in the list of those who qualified. "We achieved riteria and then what happened?" The candidates could not believe it. The land phone line in the UGC office became in Jam with continous calls and they could make it engaged. UGC did not expected this type of
responses. Though they published the criteria for exams for June and December 2011 and it has been followed and no changes had been made just before or after publishing result , but before that upto December 2010 UGC published an earlier criteria but changed it and it could be known
only below the mark sheet when published. So UGC's plan was to publish the criteria of passing NET for June 2012 only with Mark sheet. But the disturbing and continuous phone call made them to publish the criteria just on the next day of Result published ie. on 19th September. It became controversial and candidates who not cleared NET because of new criteria of aggregate 65% ,60% and 55% Respectively for General,OBC NCL and SC/ST/PH approached court as they were with proof of OMR and Marksheet. In most of High courts in India candidates joined in appeal and Kerala High Court earlier ordered UGC to not to destroy answer sheets as UGC had a practice of distroying answer sheets after one month. On the last of December KHC again ordered in favour of petitioners and cancelled the after exam criteria.

In the midst of this UGC invited application for December 2012 with the same criteria but announced it is only minimum and actual winners will be selected from them. Just two or three days before Examination date ie. 30/11/2012 UGC published the criteria and steps for declaring winners (Now it is removed from site) that only 15% of those who get minimum criteria should be cleared NET in subject wise and Catogery wise. This will result nearly 6 to 7 % ogf total candidates passed and
all others are exposed to being failed

It is said that NET is an Eligibility Test and the performance in such tests should be absolute ie. the performance of one should be evaluated only on the criteria and not compared or effecting others. If the top 15% rule is applied suppose you got 80% and more people scores above
that, then you will fail

So Please reply and vote to take an opinion poll whether UGC is Right or Wrong


-----------------------------

----------------------------

----------------------------

v4vhse.forumotion.in

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
സുഖമൊരു ബിന്ദു .............
ദുഃഖമൊരു ബിന്ദു..............
ബിന്ദുവില്‍ നിന്നും ബിന്ദുവിലേക്കൊരു പെന്റുലമാടുന്നു.
ജീവിതം ........അത് ജീവിതം


[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

2default Re: Is UGC Criteria for December Rational? on Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:52 pm

florisa


Ugc is cheating youth by not disclosing the criteria with examination notificatio from the starting of net exam. The students could not realise it in descriptive sessions

3default Re: Is UGC Criteria for December Rational? on Sat Feb 09, 2013 11:54 pm

vivaradoshi


SILVER
SILVER
It is not rational


-----------------------------

----------------------------

----------------------------

v4vhse.forumotion.in

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
ഇത് വിവരവും വിദ്യാഭ്യാസവും ഉള്ളവരുടെ ലോകം.പക്ഷെ ലോകത്ത്‌ കാണുന്നതോ വിവരക്കേടിന്റെ സാമ്രാജ്യങ്ങള്‍........ അവിടെ എന്തും വിളിച്ചുപറയാന്‍ കഴിയുന്ന ഒരാളെ ഉള്ളൂ..... വിവരദോഷി


[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

4default Re: Is UGC Criteria for December Rational? on Tue Mar 05, 2013 5:36 pm

shirkesumita


NO IT IS NOT AT ALL RATIONAL AS EVERYONE DIES HARD TO QUALIFY THE NET EXAMINATION.

IF UGC IS APPLYING QUALIFING CRITERIA ONLY IF SO BECAUSE THE EXAMINATION IS IN OBJECTIVE MANNER THAN IT HAS TO APPLY THIS RULE TO ALL THE PREVIOUS NET EXAMINATIONS. AND THIS IS SHEER DISCRIMINATION. WHEN ONCE MINIMUM SCORE REQUIREMENT IS DECLARED THAN THERE IS NO FURTHER NEED OF CRITERIA OF DECLARATION OF THE RESULTS.

Sponsored content


View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum